Sunday, November 20, 2011

TED Video: Andrew Mwenda Takes a New Look at Africa

 

Mr. Garrioch's directions
     So this time, when I visited TED, I decided to click on "Resize by .....persuasive" on the left column. After skimming through the titles of the appearing images, I chose a speech with the title "Andrew Mwenda takes a new look at Africa."
     Before I began watching the 17-minute-speech, I skimmed through the comments that were written on the post. Surprisingly, there were some disdainful writers asserting the speech to be dogmatic and provocative.
     After listening to the speech, though, I found myself in dissent with such criticisms. The overall speech was lucid, his discernment being acute. Though his argument that financial aid of supercilious developed countries to African countries actually results in aggravating the infamous corruption in Africa and makes the continent more dependent was rather eccentric and ironical, the speech was elaborate in overall, supported by credulous evidences.
     His saying that many African countries are in fact not in the state of anarchy was also interesting. He contributes the formation of such stereotypes to the media's solicitation  for impressive, but many times biased, stories. 
     After seeing the speech, I did some scrutiny about the speech giver, Andrew Mwenda. Mwenda is a founder and owner of The Independent, an Ugandan newspaper that is renown for its caustic criticisms on the authoritarian bureaucratic government. And even during his writing career in The Monitor and in his quotations for diverse media such as the BBC or CNN, he was well known for his astute visions that financial aids on African countries do nothing but aggravating the stagnation of the continents' countries economy.
(The 20 word burden is off finally. I will write with my voice, my vocab use from here.)
      However, while I was watching this speech, one question came to my mind: The methods that Mwenda proposed, do they really work? He talked about promoting growth in high level scientific technology. Well, how exactly are the "developed" nations supposed to help the countries out? By providing some advanced technology out of a mist for free? Or build a high-tech scientific facility in the center of a desert, when the security of the country is so vulnerable so that the expensive scientific facility is nothing but a piece of ice that would be destroyed if let alone? Are these measures really supposed to stimulate African entrepreneurs and improve independence? Is spoon-feeding of high level technology rather than "letting them grow" after building primary education really something that other countries should do? What does high-level technology supposed to do to entrepreneurs? Aren't other matters such as the vulnerability of politics in the nations or the security issues more urgent? Such questions couldn't be answered by the seventeen-minute-speech by Mwenda.
     I liked the speech. I myself do not believe in spoon-feeding African nations, and it was really nice to see a real Ugandan scholar explaining to me why the nations shouldn't be just given away financial aids. But, unfortunately, there were some holes in the logic of Mwenda that couldn't be answered sufficiently.
    

2 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Funny you use this video. It helped me with a project I worked on with two digital design students when I went to filmschool. I had to write a script and come up with a concept for an "infographic" on aid in Africa, so I borrowed some ideas from this TED talk and used them to create the concept and script for this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba9HX0b80Xc

    I didn't get much credit for it, as the design students did all the work to bring the visuals to life, but I did spin the concept and stages.

    How you enjoy it!

    We definitely have to help Africa help itself. Cure the symptoms to avoid the disease.

    Nice post. I like your last paragraph. The SAT words could be a integrated a bit better. They do seem a bit jammed in place.

    ReplyDelete